Showing posts with label Liberal Bias. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Bias. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Unperky Ratings for Couric


Couric
rashes



Gender Bias?


"Gender" Blamed for Katie Couric's Low Ratings: Tuesday, Jan. 30, 2007
CBS News and Sports President Sean McManus says that gender bias may play a role in the disappointing ratings Katie Couric has been getting on CBS Evening News.

"I think it is a fact there are probably people, both men and women, who are perhaps uncomfortable having a woman anchor the news," McManus told the media industry publication Broadcasting & Cable.

"The way she is scrutinized, I think sometimes unfairly, quite frankly, I think a lot of that has to do with gender."

McManus maintained that as a woman, Couric has to be concerned about 'a lot of things the male anchor doesn't have to worry about, like how she looks or what she is wearing."

The Real Reasons for Couric's Low Ratings


With all due respect to Mr. McManus, I believe the reason Couric's numbers have fallen is not because she is different, ala being a woman, but that she is the same. She is the same old touchy feely liberal bias wrapped up in a new gender and new clothes.




Despite her attempts at being objective, with her Free Speech segments, her underlying sympathies show through loud and clear. What makes FOX so appealing on cable is that they give voice to a side that has been neglected by the other media. The same can be said for talk radio. When the people have a choice, they go for Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity over Air America, Al Franken, and even Alan Combs any day.

The networks have never used a conservative anchor. They ought to try it. They might like it.


The Stiffness Factor


One problem with finding a conservative for the job is the stiffness factor. Several conservatives are less fun than liberals. They are wrapped up in righteousness and act like they have a stick up their rears. Some conservatives who are enjoyable are too radical. Ann Coulter is more fun than a barrel full of puppies, but she'd be a poor choice for a news anchor.

Find the Doppelganger Plus of Katie Couric on the Right


I suggest the networks find a conservative female who is not overly religious, and not overly stern, but who has gravitas on the major issues of the day. This would be a more serious version of Katie Couric, but on the right. Not too religious. Not too dogmatic. But with a conservative bent. Able to smile, and laugh, and joke; but with a real interest and understanding of world issues.

One Girl Who Could Do It


Do I have suggestions? It's a difficult task.

Surprisingly, even to me, is one person that pops into my head as perfect for the job, Democrat Tammy Bruce. Of course, she would have to abandon her combative side and adopt a more sober demeanor, but she is an example, to me, of the kind of woman who could present the news with a depth of understanding and draw ratings too.


click to show/hide the rest of the post

About Ms. Bruce

Tammy Bruce (born August 19, 1962) is an author and political commentator. Bruce hosts The Tammy Bruce Show, a radio talk show broadcast on over 160 stations in the United States. The show broadcasts six days a week, including Saturdays. Each episode is three hours long. NewsMax.com Magazine's "Top 25 Talk Radio Host" list selected Bruce as the twenty-fourth most influential host in the nation. She is described on her website as "an openly gay, pro-choice, gun owning, pro-death penalty, voted-for-President Bush progressive feminist". Bruce is a self-described classical liberal.

For seven years, Bruce served as president of the Los Angeles chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW) from 1990 to 1996, the longest continuous tenure in the chapter's 30-year history. She mobilized activists locally and nationally on a whole range of issues, including women's image in media, childcare, health care, violence against women, economics, and domestic violence. She also served two years on the board of directors for NOW, which she heavily criticizes in her last book.

Tammy, while remaining a Democrat, has taken a decided right turn in her outlook in the last several years. She is highly supportive of George Bush and the Iraq War, and holds now several conservative positions on national issues. She does remain liberal on many social issues, but she is tolerant of opposing views. She takes her Democratic Party to task on their demagoguery, as I do.

Her Books

The New Thought Police: Inside the Left's Assault on Free Speech and Free Minds

The Death of Right and Wrong: Exposing the Left's Assault on Our Culture and Values , (Random House, 2003).

The New American Revolution: Using the Power of the Individual to Save Our Nation from Extremists (Morrow, 2005)

Her newest book is The New American Revolution, How You Can Fight The Tyranny of The Left's Cultural and Moral Decay


Pigeonholing Tammy


Ms. Bruce is an anomaly, and the left doesn't know what to do with her. She still stands tall as a hard-driving, reasonable feminist, and wants to remain a Democrat, but she is disgusted where her party has gone. Sound familiar? That's my line. She is a classical liberal. That's how I see myself. Which translates into today's jargon as conservative, or even neo-con. But it's really just classical liberal—the same beliefs on many issues that great Democrats have held, like FDR, Truman, and Kennedy. Strong on defense, patriotic, pro-business. Believing in God, but not overly religious. Tolerant.

click to hide most of this post


Ms. Bruce as Anchor


Anyway, off my soapbox and back on topic. Ms. Bruce is one example of a female, I think, who could hold her own as a news anchor. Why would she succeed where Couric is failing? Ms. Bruce is pretty, like Couric, but more so; intelligent, far more than Couric; and has gravitas, far more than Couric. She is passionate about world issues, much like the men—Brokaw, Williams, and Gibson. Plus, she is basically conservative, without being stiff.

Let's face it, Couric is a lightweight. She is not passionate about world events. She is not well informed. Her politics are liberal, and based on feelings. Who will turn to her for her views on the world?

Get a woman like Tammy Bruce, and you've got a chance for an audience.


Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)


Click here to get a button link to this blog:


Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site!


Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join or Surf Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome.


Technorati Tags for this post:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Regular Technorati Tags for this blog: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Friday, January 19, 2007

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly


Demcratic
control



Pax Democratia


I'm hoping for sanity in government. Common sense. Like many conservatives, I am dismayed that Democrats have taken control of Congress. On the other hand, I am not opposed to anything any Democrat might do to bring us good governance.

It is way too early to judge Democrats in their new role. However, I just want to mention that I sense some good and some bad in what they are doing.


The Iraq War


With regard to Iraq, they are demagoging the War, which was my worst fear.





By doing this, in my opinion, they are playing with the lives of American soldiers and citizens, and they ought to be voted out of office just for this alone. Even Hillary now is against the surge, when several Democrats had called for a surge for months. It is so obviously political, and some Republicans are lining up beside them. It is disgraceful.


Reforming Congress


On the other hand, some attempts at reforming Congress, initiated by Democrats, appear genuine:

Lobbying, Earmarks, Line-Item Veto

Senate Passes Vast Ethics Overhaul: By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK, Published: January 19, 2007.
WASHINGTON. The Senate on Thursday overwhelmingly passed sweeping changes to ethics and lobbying rules, overcoming bipartisan reluctance to ban many of the favors that lobbyists do for lawmakers and to illuminate the shadowy legislative practice of earmarking money for special projects.

The Senate's action makes the start of the 110th Congress a watershed moment in the history of K Street and Capitol Hill. Interpreting the results of the Nov. 7 election as a reaction to corruption scandals when Congress was under Republican control, the Senate has joined the House in adopting broad new rules that go beyond the proposals Republicans introduced last year, the ones that Democrats campaigned on, or the extensive changes House Democrats recently passed.

Congress will be voting on the line-item veto next week, proposed by Republicans, when they discuss a raise in the Minimum Wage. The line-item veto would be a great step forward in eliminating corruption.

Legislating Fairness

One bad reform that the Democrats are attempting, for the umpteenth time, is the Fairness Doctrine. Read about this doctrine here: NOW with David Brancaccio. Politics & Economy. What Happened to Fairness? | PBS: "History of the Fairness Doctrine"

The effect of it will be an attack on talk radio, which is mostly conservative, forcing them to be "fair" by requiring response time for every conservative viewpoint put forth. What this really means is that the Democrats can't compete in the free market of ideas on talk radio, as in the recent failure of Air America, and so must rely on legislation to get airtime.

It's funny how the Democrats see such an imbalance in the presentation of ideas on talk radio, but fail to recognize the opposite imbalance with the major news media on TV. The Republican response to the left-wing bias of American TV networks is to compete where it is possible, on cable news—and once again, when the free market prevails, conservatives rule, as with FOX News.


Subverting the Will of the People

Democrats have this propensity to try and subvert the will of the people in all kinds of spheres. When the public doesn't want gay marriage, for example, Democrats impose it with activist judges. When the public clamors for conservative talk radio, Democrats begin prattling on about "fairness."

Conclusions


I'd give the Democrats mixed reviews so far.

They are an utter disgrace when it comes to the War on Terror and the War in Iraq.

They are pushing some needed reforms with lobbying, financial disclosures, and earmarks. If they do this fairly and accept the line-item veto, they can significantly improve Washington ethics for generations to come.

They are again trying to squelch free speech and impose fascist-like control over broadcasting by reintroducing the Fairness Doctrine.

I hope the American people get educated on these issues and give the appropriate feedback to Democrats for these actions; some praise, and some criticism. Of course, the Dems ought to be voted out of office next time for their behavior on the War on Terror and the War in Iraq, but we'll see.


Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)


Click here to get a button link to this blog:


Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site!


Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join or Surf Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome.


Technorati Tags for this post: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Regular Technorati Tags for this blog: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,