Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary Clinton. Show all posts

Monday, June 18, 2007

Whom Do You Love?

The Recent Polls and What They Suggest


P
olls and

erceptions



The '08 Presidential Election


In the most recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll,54% of Americans are inclined to vote for a Democrat for president in the next election; while 31% say they favor a Republican.




Still, in the most recent Quinnipiac University Poll, when the specific candidates are pitted against each other, the story changes.

Rudy Giuliani 44%, Hillary Clinton 45%
John McCain 42%, Hillary Clinton 44%
Fred Thompson 39%, Hillary Clinton 46%

A similar picture manifests with Barack Obama.

Rudy Giuliani 42%, Barack Obama 42%
John McCain 41%, Barack Obama 43%
Fred Thompson 34%, Barack Obama 46%


Presidential Approval Rating


In the most recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 29% of the American people approve of the overall job President Bush is doing in office, while 66% disapprove. This is a drop of six points since April, and it represents his lowest mark ever on this question in the NBC/Journal poll.
Democratic pollster Jay Campbell, attributes this decline to Republicans. Back in April, 75 percent of Republicans approved of Bush’s job performance, compared with 21 percent who disapproved. Now, only 62 percent of Republicans approve, versus 32 percent who disapprove.

Congress


In the most recent AP-Ipsos poll,
WASHINGTON - People think the Democratic-led Congress is doing just as dreary a job as President Bush, following four months of bitter political standoffs that have seen little progress on Iraq and a host of domestic issues.

The survey found only 35 percent approve of how Congress is handling its job, down 5 percentage points in a month. That gives lawmakers the same bleak approval rating as Bush, who has been mired at about that level since last fall, including his dip to a record low for the AP-Ipsos poll of 32 percent last January.

In another measure of popular discontent, the survey found that 71 percent say the country is on the wrong track - about even with the 73 percent who said so last May, the worst level since the AP-Ipsos poll began in December 2003.

What about Nancy Pelosi? The same AP-Ispsos poll found that:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is a more popular figure than the president and her colleagues on Capitol Hill, though she faces a gender gap in which significantly more women than men support her.

Pelosi's overall approval of 45 percent stood 10 points higher than Bush's and Congress'.

She was seen favorably by 52 percent of women, but only 39 percent of men. While whites are closely split about her, minorities approve of her job by a 15-point margin.

The War in Iraq


In the most recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll, 28 % of the American people approve of the way Bush is handling the war in Iraq, while 68% disapprove.

Illegal Immigration


A new Washington Post-ABC poll and follow-up interviews found that:

click to show/hide the rest of the post

Americans remain divided and uncertain about how best to deal with the estimated 12 million people living illegally in the United States.

More than half of those surveyed said illegal immigrants hurt the country more than help it, an opinion voiced by seven in 10 Republicans and about half of Democrats.

A slim majority believe in creating a pathway to citizenship, with younger people and Democrats far more open to the idea than Republicans and those over 55.

State of the Republican Party


Since I favor Republicans at this time in history, this all represents a big mess for me. Everything seems to be going wrong for conservatives at the same time, and at warp speed and with irreversible momentum.

I know some of my readers think highly of Bush, and that 62% of Republicans still approve of the job he is doing. I am not one of these. I continue to admire his doggedness in the War in Iraq, and for the highly effective War on Terror he has waged. For these, I believe President Bush deserves our everlasting thanks.

I am also happy with him over the economy. He has kept our taxes low, and enabled an expansion to continue in the middle of a major war.

On the other hand, I continue to fault him for the politically correct way he is waging the War in Iraq, with his restrictive rules of engagement. I also don't think he has been expert in his handling of other cultures in the Middle East. Mostly, I believe, he continues to try to be a "nice guy," not realizing that what is needed is firmness and ruthlessness, much as we mustered in World War II. I am also unhappy with his amnesty plan for illegals.

Most of all, I am dissatisfied with him over his inability to lead our country to see what he sees concerning the necessity for the Iraq War, and for his vision for the Middle East. He is content to continue to "do the right things" as he perceives them, without understanding that he must also become a great communicator and salesman, despite his shortcomings in this area.

click to hide most of this post


What Lies Ahead?


If things continue as they are now, Republicans will lose some of their base. They can't afford this. It is still possible for one of the attractive Republican candidates to defeat Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, but even if this happens, Congress will slide even more left than it is now, barring a major shift.

What this means is, look out for your pocketbooks; short the stock market; be ready to join the religion of environmental extremism; expect to lose the War on Terror, for now; and forget about a peaceful Middle East.

Ideally, we'd have some candidate with a world vision that can help shape a more peaceful world. I don't see that candidate yet. Hopefully, someone will be imbued with wisdom and start thinking about the future of the world rather than the next election. I will vote for that person. My suggestion for him or her is, fine—win your primary. Then, however, get serious and start acting presidential. If you can get away with acting presidential even now, do it. Should you still win your primary, you'll have an edge on gravitas over the rest of the candidates in the final election.


Who Has the Potential to be a Great Leader?


Which candidates do have it in them to grow into this presidential persona? I believe they are Clinton, Obama, McCain, Giuliani, and Thompson. Clinton and Obama, of course, have the biggest challenge with this—as they are true liberals, and the world does not need liberal solutions at this time. Yet, Clinton could do it, if she allows herself to grow. Obama could do it if he listens to his innate intelligence, ignoring his poll numbers to an extent.

What about Romney? I doubt he'd have the flexibility to see the world as it really is, but I may be wrong. We'll see. He is, after all, a presidential candidate who would present a pretty face to the world, backed by a high level of intelligence and communication skills.

There, the gauntlet is laid. Who will pick it up?


Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)


Click here to get a button link to this blog:


Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site!


Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join or Surf Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome.


Technorati Tags for this post: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Regular Technorati Tags for this blog: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Monday, May 7, 2007

Left and Right Turns


The Political Pendulum



The

Right Stuff






Veering Left


The country veering most left at this time in history is Venezuela, with Hugo Chavez going forward with his goal of a "classless society." All the Marxists are cheering him as he nationalizes oil companies and banks, and forces other companies into agreements that will guarantee social benefits. On the one hand, his goals are quite noble. He seems like he is truly trying to help the people (as much as any dictator can and still fill his own pockets). On the other hand, he is outright stealing from companies that came in with agreements and contracts which he has now nullified. The question is, who in the future will invest in Venezuela? If you owned a private company, would you gamble your hard won assets on whether Hugo will honor any agreement you sign with him?

Just as with Castro, Mr. Chavez will find that stealing from companies now will make him a hero short term, but will deprive the people of millions of dollars in the long run. The growth of his country will suffer due to his bad relations with the world.

Marxism has been tried, Mr. Chavez, and it doesn't work.


Veering Right


One of the countries that is veering right at this time is, surprise, surprise—France! I can't believe it. The French have elected a conservative over a socialist, Nikolas Sarkozy. He is going to get tough on immigration, be kind to business, and try to lower taxes. Let's move to France! In addition, he wants to improve relations with the United States.

Don't be surprised, also, if another country known for leftism veers right in the coming years. Fidel Castro is rumored to be in his last days on earth. His brother, Raul, appears to be much more friendly to Western nations, and to capitalism. What will Hugo say? Cuba will explode with growth if this shift happens.


France and Cuba veering right? Are we living in a dream?




Veering Left


Sadly, while France and Cuba might be heading in a positive direction, we, the United States of America, are one of the countries veering left. On the rise are the Marxists of the Democratic Party.

The Debates

I watched both the Democratic and Republican debates. The Democrats all admitted they will raise taxes, increase regulations, force the color green on the world, and decrease world security by marginalizing the war on terror. I could barely force myself to watch. Yet, the country seems dead set on electing one of them.

No wonder. The Republicans were pro-business, but lacked vigor. They were not as passionate as they should have been either about Iraq or the war on terror, with the possible exception of McCain. They appeared meek and back to cowering in Panderland. All of them paid homage to Ronald Reagan, but there wasn't a Ronald among them. The only thing they appeared passionate about was religion. Pardon me, but I don't think faith is the issue. I don't want a president who is pastor-in-chief. I want someone passionate about winning the war on terror, and helping capitalism live and thrive. Let's keep church and state separate.

The Sad State of the Right

Fire in the Belly


I'm not even impressed with Newt anymore. He is "waiting," before he decides whether to run, and on the talk shows he sounds so green he could be Al Gore's brother. I'm not happy with Fred Thompson either, the great conservative hero. He's not in the fight yet either. Like Newt, he's "waiting."

A president needs fire in the belly. If you're not absolutely sure you're the man, or woman, then don't bother running. The U.S. will never elect Newt now. He's demonstrated he doesn't want it badly enough. I doubt they'll choose Thompson either. He's too late, cancer or no cancer.


Weak


Especially weak on the dais was Rudy Giuliani. He still is the frontrunner, but he'd better turn in better performances than this debate if he wants to win. He must come across as a giant, not as a meek defender of his pro-choice views. He's got to get back to the lion he was post 9/11.

A Fair Performance


McCain gave the best account of himself among the Republicans. He had some fire and he distinguished himself with his zeal on the War in Iraq.

Presidential Aura

Looking for the Glow


I try to look for the presidential aura in candidates, and I'm not sure I see it yet in anyone. I cringe when I imagine Hillary back in the White House. I don't see Obama ready yet to make sophisticated decisions. My stomach turns when I think of demagogue Edwards as president.

Yet, I don't see the presidential aura surrounding any Republicans either. I pray they start connecting to their personal power and the supremacy of truth. It can still happen.


Seeking a Leader


It's still early, but I'm looking for a leader that can stop this country's disastrous lurch to the left.

Thank God for France. Vive la France!


Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)


Click here to get a button link to this blog:


Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site!


Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join or Surf Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome.


Technorati Tags for this post: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Regular Technorati Tags for this blog: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Monday, February 12, 2007

Obamamania



Barack




Historic Election


This is going to be one of the most fascinating presidential races in U.S. history. For the first time in 80 years there is no one running who was a Vice President or President, and the field is wide open. It is open in this way, and in every other way. This race will be multi-cultural, multi-racial, multi-gender, and multi-religious.







There is the first Hispanic running. The first Black with a real chance of winning. The first female with a real chance of winning. A Mormon. True liberals, and true conservatives, and those in-between.

All this in the middle of an unpopular war that will determine the fate of mankind, let alone of this country. The United States is on the brink of turning into a socialist country too, worried so much about global warming and other manufactured issues and myths that the far left has a real chance of taking over the country. It is even rumored that a sleeper candidate could announce at any time now, and instantly overtake the whole crowd, Mr. Al "Inconvenient Truth" Gore, father of all demagogues.


Obama and Other Great Speakers


I watched, as many of you did too, Barack Obama's declaration of candidacy in Springfield, Illinois, where Lincoln once announced his candidacy too. Though I am, as you know, a conservative on many issues, a libertarian on others, a liberal on some, and on a few issues a libertine; with the nomer neo-con being the closest philosophy to my heart—I was enthralled with Barack's speech and delivery. To me, it was electrifying, and it sent chills down my back. Finally, a politician who can deliver a great speech.

click to show/hide the rest of the post


I haven't seen this in my lifetime since John F. Kennedy. Yes, you're right, Bill Clinton could do it too, but Clinton was so much a demagogue in my eyes that the words did not chill my backbone, they chilled my heart. Other great speakers of the 20th and 21st century were Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, Adolf Hitler (a great spokesperson for evil), Martin Luther King and Ronald Reagan. Barrack is not in their league, none of them. But he stands head and shoulders over the rest of the current pack. Compare him with Hillary and she comes off as shrill, marmish, with a pinched face, anger in her heart, and with a stick up her rear.

Articulosity


Plus, he is ARTICULATE. There, I've said it. The African-American community is all a twitter about Biden and now Bush calling Barack this nasty word. It demeans, they think, all African-Americans. That's how far political correctness has come, my friends. We can't even compliment Blacks now without being called racists. Well, I do understand the concern. After all, the implication is that this Black is articulate, which is surprising—after all, there are very few articulate African-Americans. Ouch.

So, let me clarify for all of you, and for my dear African-American friends. It is not surprising to me that we've discovered an articulate Black. There are many well-spoken African-Americans. When I say that Barack Obama is articulate, I don't mean to compare him with other Blacks. I mean to say that this guy is A R T I C U L A T E period. He is articulate compared to all races, to all White folks, to all humans. The guy can speak. He can communicate. He is bright, insightful, and his words flow easily and with passion.

I'm not surprised that we have found an articulate Black. I'm surprised that we've found an articulate politician. They are rare these days. You don't have to just think of the anti-articulate Bush. Just think of Hillary. Compared to her husband Bill, she's autistic. Like I say, Barack is not in the same league as Martin Luther King or John F. Kennedy, but he's a person that can mesmerize a crowd.


Othello versus Lady Macbeth


I also sense in him that he has a kind of goodness. He does have the fire in the belly that a presidential candidate needs, but I don't sense he has any lizard-like go-for-the-throat coldness that Hillary has, thank God. Hillary would slash the jugular of her child to become President. Barack would try to find another way. He truly believes, it appears, in his mission of goodness. Barack is Othello, misguided into liberalism, but with a good heart. Hillary is our Lady Macbeth, plotting for political power regardless of casualties like the truth.

click to hide most of this post


What to Do With Barack?

Talent Wasted on Liberalism

Alas, Barack is an idiot by default, by my definition. He's a liberal.

Left of Center But Less Of a Demagogue

I could love this man, almost. It's a crying shame he's on the wrong side. It's disastrous that he really is a bleeding heart liberal with a soak the rich, class warfare, socialist, anti-military, multi-cultural mushy mushy heart and head. He is all this, believe me. Just examine his voting record. He's a liberal to the bone. The enemy. Yet, my deepest antipathy for the left is reserved for demagogues, and I get the feeling that he is less of a demagogue than the rest of them. He truly believes in his liberal nonsense.

What do I do with him? He will be president one day, or vice president, or hold some other high office beyond Senator.

I don't know what to do with him. I rest assured, though, that he sounds like a reasonable idiot. He seems practical. He won't totally destroy the country, it appears, like Hillary would. So, my decision for now is to thank God that He has sent us an attractive liberal who could break down racial barriers and add a bit of honor and character to the dismal crowd of leftists inhabiting the Democratic Party.

Amen.


Advice for the Republican Party


As for the Republicans, the only way that you can beat a ticket with Obama on it, would be for you to nominate a Giuliani/McCain ticket, or, better yet, a Giuliani/Condoleeza Rice ticket. Or, make sure that if Hillary is the nominee, that you contrast this female crocodile with the sweet brilliance of her charismatic running mate. Ensure that the country sees Hillary for what is in her arctic heart. If the people look past Hillary and concentrate more on Obama, then you, conservatives, are in trouble.

Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)


Click here to get a button link to this blog:


Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site!


Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join or Surf Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome.


Technorati Tags for this post: , , , , , ,

Regular Technorati Tags for this blog: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Saturday, January 20, 2007

She's Coming


Hillary




Get Ready


Clinton Says I'm In to Win 2008 Race New York Times:

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton announced this morning that she was taking the first formal step to seek the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008. By PATRICK HEALY, Published: January 20, 2007.

Six years after making history by winning a United States Senate seat as first lady, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton announced this morning that she was taking the first formal step to seek the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, a journey that would break yet more political barriers in her extraordinary and controversial career.

"I'm in," she says in a statement on her new campaign Web site, HillaryClinton.com. "And I'm in to win." Mrs. Clinton, 59, called for bold but practical changes in foreign, domestic, and national security policy and said that she would focus on finding "a right end" to the Iraq war, expanding health insurance, pursuing greater energy independence and strengthening Social Security and Medicare.

I would note that Mrs. Clinton, with regard to Iraq, is not seeking "victory", but "a right end."

As far as health care and Medicare go, we all know what this means by her previous attempts at health care legislation; socialized medicine and all that this entails.

These are just cautionary statements. There will be plenty of time to debate the issues.


The main thing that I want to say to the nation at this time is just get ready for Hillary.




Hillary Trumps Obama


Despite recent polls that show she is facing great competition from Barack Obama, it is my belief that Obama is not ready yet, and the people will discover this before too long. Mrs. Clinton has the gravitas that Obama lacks, the heft. She has the connections, the money-raising machine, the worldwide reach, and the hidden reservoir of goodwill that Bill Clinton built with liberals.

Mrs. Clinton has proven herself electable in New York, even garnering Republican votes and winning landslide elections. She is not an ideal candidate, not like Bill. She can be shrill, and she has a difficult time deciding where she stands on issues, like Iraq. Yet, she is shrewd enough to adjust, and I believe she is a formidable politician.


Forces of Nature


Hillary will win the Democratic nomination for president, and be the first lady (forgive the pun) to do so. What's more, I believe she will be a formidable opponent for any Republican, despite her negatives. She and Bill campaigning will be overwhelming.

One team that would be almost unbeatable, in my opinion, would be her as the presidential candidate with Barack Obama as the vice-presidential candidate. Race over.

Well, not so fast. On the Republican side, if John McCain were to win the nomination, or Rudy Giuliani, then there might be a small chance for the Republicans, depending on the vice-presidential nominee. If Condi Rice could be persuaded to run, even for the second spot on the ticket, this could change the calculations.


Looking for a Leader


I know it's way too early to accurately predict, but I'm willing to say that I believe Hillary will win the nomination, and the presidency in 2008, maybe with Barack as the Vice President, unless the Republicans grow out of being politicians and transform into real leaders, starting today. They will not beat Mrs. Clinton by trying to outdo her with giving the people what they want. She's going to promise them the moon. The country will elect Hillary/Barack unless there is a true leader to beat them.

Yes, John McCain and Rudy Giuliani are such kinds of leaders. McCain, though, is quite old for a presidential candidate, getting up to Reagan-like years, and Americans are left with memories of Mr. Reagan's last years of falling asleep at meetings and such. McCain is 70 now, and would be 72 when he would take the oath, the oldest American ever elected. Reagan was 69 when he first took office.

Giuliani's problem is getting nominated. He probably is too liberal for most Republicans. Unfortunately. He'd be great. Of the two, McCain has the best chance of getting nominated. A McCain/Giuliani ticket could be competitive; but a McCain/Rice ticket would be even better.


The Prediction


Still, I give the nod to Mrs. Clinton. If I'm right—nation, get ready for Hillary.

Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)


Click here to get a button link to this blog:


Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site!


Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join or Surf Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome.


Technorati Tags for this post: , , , , , , ,

Regular Technorati Tags for this blog: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Friday, January 5, 2007

The Zeitgeist

I've Had it With Schwarzenegger


Schwarzenegger eyes health coverage for Calif. Kids:
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Governor

A


rnold
Schwarzenegger is expected to propose extending health care to the 10 percent of California's children who are uninsured, even if they are here illegally, and force firms to bolster adult coverage, officials said on Thursday.

I've had it with Arnold. He has completely flipped now and turned into a Democrat. He is as liberal as Pelosi in my opinion. Arnold now so much enjoys being loved by Californians, who are overwhelmingly left of center at this time in our history, that he buys their central tenet of wanting to give everything to everybody. He is Santa Claus, Jingle All the Way.




For the first time in recent history, this year more people left the state of California than entered, and this includes illegals. A miracle. A marvelous miracle. Now, Arnold is going to change all that. Hey, if you want an i.d., a job, a driver's license, and free health care for your kids, amigos, California is the place to be. Can you say MAGNET?

We will soon be supplying all of Northern Mexico with health care. Great idea Arnold. And how are we going to pay for this? Why, the good old liberal way, with higher taxes; which will drive away businesses, which will lower consumption, which will depress our standard of living. Great. We already need to learn Spanish as our PRIMARY language, but now we'll have to stock up on Mexican flags so we can get in line with our neighbors.

I want to be the first to suggest a recall of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. What was good enough for Grey Davis is good enough for Arnold. Who wants to start the petition? I'll sign it.


The Beauty of the Beast


Nancy Pelosi looked spectacular yesterday as she took the gavel, and she humanized herself by surrounding herself with her beautiful grandchildren. I have to admit that this smiling, charming woman is formidable. I think of her as a dragon-lady, but she certainly didn't project that on her first appearance as Speaker of the House. I also want to make it clear that I am happy we have a female Speaker for the first time. I am looking forward also to our first female President and first black President and first Hispanic president—just please don't let it be Pelosi, Hillary, Maxine Waters, Charlie Rangel, or any other Victocrat communist.

Poor Barack


I am even now disappointed in Barack Obama, since in his book just out he re-asserts his playing the race and victim cards like he did in his earlier book.

He admits he used drugs because he was struggling with an identity crisis as a black man, and he had to "play on the white man's court." Poor Barack. His African kin abandoned him as a child while his white kin stuck by him—yes, he sure was abused by The Man. I am eager to find heroes in our society, but I keep getting disappointed. I thought Barrack was on his way to greatness. Instead, I see he's on his way to Jesse Jacksonism.


Heartbeats Away From the Presidency


By the way, now, Cheney, whose life depends on a pacemaker, will be President should something happen to Bush. Next comes Pelosi, our San Francisco communist treat, should Cheney's pacemaker falter. If misfortune then befalls Pelosi, third in line is Robert Byrd, President Pro Tempore of the United States Senate, former Exalted Cyclops of the Ku Klux Klan. Our nation is on shakier ground than the Golden Gate Bridge.

Abraham Bush


Bush appears to be trying to emulate Lincoln now. He is firing the generals, something Lincoln did until he finally got his Sherman's and Grant's. I hope that Bush is just as successful with this as Lincoln was. Do we have a Sherman or Grant?

What Have We Done to You Poor Mr. Saddam?


The New York Times as usual is aghast at the treatment of tyrants. They've run daily stories now on poor Saddam's mistreatment at his execution, and the haste of the thing, and the illegality of the thing. Not a word on the people Saddam slaughtered. Typical left-wing sympathy for tyrants, dictators and anti-American sentiments. For years they've been saying we should butt out of Iraq and let the Iraqi's run their own things, but now we should have intervened in the Iraqi trial and execution process to stop this horrible brutality from being perpetrated against the poor Mr. Saddam. The New York Times is a rag.

Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)


Click here to get a button link to this blog:


Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site!


Subscribe to my feed


Join or Surf Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome.


Technorati Tags for this post:
, , , , , ,

Regular Technorati Tags for this blog: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,